Pros: - There are over 220 videos and hundreds of steamy photo galleries available here, and updates are made every couple of days. I've seen larger foot and leg collections, but not many, and the amount of content here is definitely a big boost for the site.

- For the most part, the quality of the Leg Sex materials is really nice. The photos are clear and crisp, just as you'd expect from a magazine publication, though the sizes do vary with the older images coming at around 800 pixels on the long side and the newer sets displaying at up to 1600 pixels on the long side with an additional option for smaller images as well. Likewise, the newer videos look nicer than the older flicks and come at up to 640x480 pixels, 2000 kbps in WMV format. Some of the other file types and specs you will see on the site include MPG at 320x240, 1400 kbps, good resolution Flash streaming at 640x480 pixels and additional WMV files in various quality levels such as 640x480, 450 kbps.

- The materials here are more than just videos and photos which may focus on legs or feet for a few brief moments. These ladies go out of their way to show off legs and feet in just about every way you can think of. They have shoes, stockings, nylons and socks of all types, and some of the babes are very flexible and can bend their long, luscious legs like ballerinas or gymnasts. They may be fully nude, or they may wear sexy lingerie, dresses or costumes. They pose solo, get freaky with other sexy foot and leg models, and even fuck and suck cock.

- The Leg Sex updates are kept track of in a long archive which is sortable by month and goes back to July of 2004. Once you've selected the month you wish to view, you can narrow the updates down to solo, girl-girl and hardcore.

Cons: - While there are some sort features here in the update log and in the model directory, it's just not enough. There needs to be some way to look for the models other than name and body type, and even a basic keyword search box would be better than nothing. The update log sort tools are helpful to a degree, but since you can only sort one month's worth of content at a time, it's a bit limited.

- There are three sections with photos, and while one of them is obviously for the image sets which come in each Leg Sex magazine issue, the difference between the others wasn't clear to me, and overall I'd prefer to see one big searchable collection. The member's area overall could use some changes in the way things are laid out.

- As is often the case on older sites, there is some variation in quality and options as you get further back into the archives. The quality shift is to be expected, but viewing and download options should be more consistent in my opinion.

There are no comments on this review. Be the first!