Pros: - Most of the big butt materials here at Bootylicious Mag are pretty high quality. The photos come in two sizes, 800x600 and 1600x1200, and most of the flicks I downloaded were either 640x480 pixels or 640x360 pixels widescreen, with bitrates of between 1500 and 2000 kbps. I had no trouble enlarging most of these to full screen for larger viewing with minimal to no quality loss.

- The viewing options here aren't the most extensive I've seen, but they do offer ZIP files each of the two (and occasionally three) photo sizes offered, and the newer flicks are offered for download in MP4 and WMV format and streaming in Flash format.

- Updates appear to be coming frequently, about once every few days or so, and sometimes slightly more or less often. There is an extensive log of additions going back a few years and sorted by month. You can sort the log to show only videos or only photos, or only solo or only hardcore scenes, but this only works for the most recent months and is not available as an option when you are browsing anything older than that.

- Though it can be a challenge to dig up all of the content here, if you can find the full collection, you're in for around 160 picture galleries and perhaps 60 or 70 videos which is a pretty decent size overall, though considerably smaller than I am used to seeing on magazine based sites.

- Though you'll be seeing mostly ebony big booty babes as I mentioned, there is a decent variety here from white babes with big jell-o asses to Latinas with athletic derrieres, and you'll see softcore posing in hot outfits, tiny thongs, booty shorts, lingerie and more, not to mention nasty hardcore fucking, blowjobs and pussy licking!

Cons: - For some reason, the larger of the two available photo sizes is only offered for download in a ZIP file with no way to view the images in galleries from within the site.

- The \"galleries\" and \"videos\" sections of the site do no contain a full list of galleries and videos available on the site. I am really completely at a loss as to why this site is set up the way it is. In order to find any of the content before March of 2007, you have to go to the archive where you can view the materials by date, or find the materials via the model search which would be hit or miss at best. The current month's update log can be sorted into videos, photos, solo, and hardcore, but anything prior to that is browsable by month and year only, and it's never once mentioned in the member's area that there are more materials to be seen than just those in the galleries and videos sections.


- Finally, something just isn't adding up here. This isn't the first time I've visited the site, and it seems like the numbers haven't' kept up with the claimed update rate. In other words, there just isn't as much here as there should be if they were really updating this often. What the cause is, I really don't know, but I could speculate that older, lower quality materials may have been removed from the lineup.

There are no comments on this review. Be the first!

Post A Comment
Name
Comment
Human?